Submitted manuscripts will first undergo an initial review by the editors to determine whether they align with the journal's theme and adhere to the submission guidelines. Papers that meet these criteria will then be assigned to qualified reviewers with expertise relevant to the paper's topic for peer review.

Pervasive Justice follows a double-blind peer review process, where both the identities of the authors and reviewers are kept confidential. This ensures an objective evaluation based solely on the content and quality of the manuscript. The final decision regarding manuscript acceptance, revision, or rejection will be made by the editorial team, considering the reviewers' comments and recommendations.

The journal maintains a strict policy against plagiarism and self-plagiarism. To ensure the originality of all submitted work, the journal utilizes Turnitin to check for potential plagiarism. Authors are required to properly cite and attribute all sources used in their manuscripts to avoid any issues related to improper citation or quotation.

By upholding these rigorous peer review and ethical standards, Pervasive Justice aims to publish high-quality, original legal research that contributes meaningfully to the field.